INHALE-3 trial: Comparing AFREZZA® to injectables and pumps
Primary endpoint met: AFREZZA demonstrated similar A1C control compared with Usual Care¹
More patients achieved A1C goal vs MDI¹
Achieved similar results to AID without a tethered device¹
Demonstrated established safety profile¹
- Similar percentage of hypoglycemia by CGM
- No significant difference in FEV₁
Consider AFREZZA in your treatment options
CONTACT A MANNKIND SALES REPRESENTATIVE TODAY
INHALE-3 study design1–3
Primary endpoint (Week 17): AFREZZA group maintained an A1C of 7.6% (0%), while the Usual Care group reduced to 7.5% (0.1%), meeting the non-inferiority margin of 0.4% (P=0.01).1
Secondary endpoint (Week 17): TIR was >70% for 24% of the AFREZZA group and 13% of the Usual Care group (mean change 12%, 95% CI -7% to 38%).1
TIR endpoint (Week 17 to Week 30, UC to AFREZZA): Daytime TIR increased from 50% ±17% at baseline to 55% ±20% after 13 weeks (mean change 5.1%; 95% CI 0.3–9.8), meeting the prespecified noninferiority criterion (margin 5%; P<0.001) and demonstrating statistical superiority vs baseline (P=0.04).2
HbA1c endpoint (Week 17 to Week 30, AFREZZA continuation): Average change in A1C was -0.21% (95% CI -0.33% to -0.09%, P<0.001).3
*Includes non-automated pumps.1,3
AFREZZA vs Usual Care: more patients on AFREZZA achieved A1C goals1,4
More AFREZZA patients achieved an A1C <7% compared to Usual Care1,4
A1C Change From Baseline in All Participants1
(Exploratory endpoint)
In patients with a baseline A1C >7%, only AFREZZA patients achieved A1C goals by Week 171,4
A1C Change From Baseline in Participants With Baseline A1C >7%1,4
(Exploratory endpoint)
AFREZZA vs Usual Care: time in range outcomes1
AFREZZA maintained TIR at Week 171
Percent Time in Range (70–180 mg/dL)
More AFREZZA patients improved TIR1
Time in Range (70–180 mg/dL) >70% at 17 Weeks
Delivery methods matter1,4†
More AFREZZA patients achieved…
AIC <7% Than Those on MDI
>70% TIR Than Those on MDI
‡Three Basal-IQ users were excluded from this analysis.4
Patients who switched to AFREZZA experienced…1
A1C Results (7%) Similar to Those Who Remained on AID
TIR Results (>7%) Similar to Those Who Remained on AID
Weight-neutrality1
The Usual Care group gained statistically more weight than the AFREZZA group
17-Week Treatment Difference (95% CI)
§Totals are calculated for participants without missing data.
AFREZZA UNITS: different bolus to basal insulin dose ratio at Week 175
Total Daily Insulin1,5||#
#Note: AFREZZA arm used insulin degludec for basal.5
INHALE-3 was a clinical trial comparing glycemic outcomes of an insulin regimen of a daily basal injection of degludec plus AFREZZA vs Usual Care in adult patients with T1D. The trial demonstrated statistically significant improvements in time in range (TIR) compared with Usual Care. Patients who received AFREZZA showed meaningful reductions in postprandial glucose excursions and A1C.1
Safety: comparable time in hypoglycemic range observed1**
Percent Time <70 mg/dL
Percent Time <54 mg/dL
dDifference is AFREZZA minus Usual Care.1
eNon-inferiority margin=2.0%.1
fNon-inferiority margin=0.5%.1
No significant change in pulmonary function1
FEV₁ showed no significant difference between groups at 17 weeks
Mean FEV₁ Change From Baseline to 17 Weeks1
Adverse events1††
hSAEs: hospitalizations for hyperglycemia/ketosis and for appendectomy.1
Treatment-emergent adverse events:
Individualized insulin therapy for your patient: a possible scenario based on INHALE-3 study design and results4,6
A1C=glycated hemoglobin; AID=automated insulin delivery; BG=blood glucose; CGM=continuous glucose monitor; FEV1=forced expiratory volume in one second; MDI=multiple daily injections; PLG=predictive low-glucose suspend technology; TIR=time in range; T1D=type 1 diabetes.
© MannKind Corporation May 2026. US-AFR-2902