Request Information

INHALE-3 Study: Comparing AFREZZA to injectables and pumps

Learn about our latest INHALE-3 clinical trial

Watch the presentation

Dr. Kevin Kaiserman

SVP Medical Affairs

INHALE-3 Study Summary

Primary endpoint met: AFREZZA demonstrated similar A1C control compared with Usual Care1

Icon of MDI beside purple chevron with text:
More patients achieved A1C goal vs MDI. 30% of participants who switched from MDI to AFREZZA achieved an A1C <7% compared to 4% who remained on MDI.

More patients achieved A1C goal vs MDI1

30% of participants who switched from MDI to AFREZZA achieved an A1C <7% compared to 4% who remained on MDI

Icon of AID beside purple chevron with text: Achieved similar results to AID without a tethered device. The AFREZZA and AID groups achieved comparable glycemic goals (A1C 70%).

Achieved similar results to AID without a tethered device1

The AFREZZA and AID groups achieved comparable glycemic goals (A1C <7% and TIR >70%)

Icon of AFREZZA inhaler beside purple chevron with text: Demonstrated stablished safety profile. Similar percentage of hypoglycemia by CGM. No significant difference in FEV1.

Demonstrated established safety profile1

  • Similar percentage of hypoglycemia by CGM
  • No significant difference in FEV1

Consider AFREZZA in your treatment options

Contact a MannKind Sales Representative today
Image of AFREZZA inhaler

Study Design

Diabetes knows no boundaries: 19 sites selected across the U.S.

123 randomized participants ≥18 years old with T1D1,2

Map of the United States indicating the 19 clinical study sites for the INHALE-3 Study.

INHALE-3 patient characteristics1,2

Two pie charts depicting patient characteristics in the INHALE-3 study: baseline A1C ≥7.0% and Usual Care insulin delivery modalities (AID, MDI, other).

INHALE-3 study design1,2

Diagram depicting the study design of the INHALE-3 Study, showing the screening phase, randomized trial/treatment phase, and extension phase.

Primary Endpoint Data

At baseline:

  • Both the AFREZZA group (n=62) and the usual care group (n=61) had a baseline average A1C of 7.6%, indicating similar baseline glycemic control in both groups

After 17 weeks:

  • The AFREZZA group (n=57) maintained an average A1C of 7.6%
  • The Usual Care group (n=58) had an average A1C of 7.5%
  • The non-inferiority margin of 0.4% was met (P=0.01)

17-week treatment difference between AFREZZA and Usual Care (95% CI): 0.11 (-0.10, 0.33)

Patients randomized to AFREZZA maintained A1C levels of 7.6 over 17 weeks2

Efficacy

AFREZZA vs Usual Care: more patients on AFREZZA achieved A1C goals1

More AFREZZA patients achieved an A1C <7% compared to Usual Care

A1C Change From Baseline in All Participants

(Exploratory endpoint)

Bar chart showing that more AFREZZA patients achieved an A1C <7.0% compared with Usual Care (30% vs 17%, respectively).

ª17-week treatment difference between AFREZZA and Usual Care (95% CI); P-value.

  • Proportion of patients experiencing a >0.5% change in A1C: Among all subjects, 21% of AFREZZA patients had a >0.5% decrease in A1C compared with 5% in the Usual Care group. Conversely, 26% of AFREZZA patients achieved a >0.5% increase in A1C, compared with 3% in the Usual Care group

In patients with a baseline A1C >7%, only AFREZZA patients achieved A1C goals by Week 17

Bar chart showing that only AFREZZA patients (21%) achieved A1C goals >7.0% by Week 17 compared with 0% on Usual Care.
  • Proportion of patients experiencing a >0.5% change in A1C: Among subjects with a baseline A1C >7%, 28% of AFREZZA patients had a >0.5% decrease in A1C compared with 7% in the Usual Care group. Conversely, 21% of AFREZZA patients achieved a >0.5% increase in A1C, compared with 2% in the Usual Care group

AFREZZA vs Usual Care: time in range outcomes1

AFREZZA maintained TIR at Week 17

Bar chart showing that AFREZZA maintained time in range outcomes similar to Usual Care at Week 17.

More AFREZZA patients improved TIR

Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL) >70% at 17 Weeks

Bar chart showing that more AFREZZA patients achieved TIR >70% at 17 weeks compared with those on Usual Care (24% vs 13%, respectively).

b17-week treatment difference between AFREZZA and Usual Care (95% CI); P-value.

  • Proportion of patients experiencing a ≥10% change in TIR: Among all subjects, 25% of AFREZZA patients increased TIR by ≥10% compared to 14% on Usual Care. Conversely, 31% of AFREZZA patients decreased TIR by ≥10%, compared to 19% on Usual Care

Delivery methods matter

More AFREZZA patients achieved…

Bar chart showing that more AFREZZA patients achieved A1C 70% than those on MDI (30% vs 4%; 24% vs 0%, respectively).

Patients who switched to AFREZZA experienced…

Bar chart showing that patients who switched to AFREZZA achieved A1C and TIR results similar to those who remained on AID (30% vs 33%; 23% vs 27%, respectively).

Weight-neutrality1

The Usual Care group gained statistically more weight than the AFREZZA group

Bar chart showing that patients in the Usual Care group gained statistically more weight than the AFREZZA group.

AFREZZA UNITS: different bolus to basal insulin dose ratio at Week 171

Before AFREZZA (baseline): Patients on usual care (which includes rapid-acting analog bolus insulin) had a ~50/50 bolus-to-basal insulin ratio

AFREZZA at Week 17: Titrated dose was ~70% bolus (in AFREZZA UNITS) to 30% basal insulin

Usual Care baseline and Usual Care Week 17: For those continuing on usual care, the ratio remains consistent at 50% bolus and 50% basal

Bar chart showing that units of AFREZZA had a different bolus to basil insulin dose ratio compared with Usual Care.

Safety

Safety: comparable time in hypoglycemic range observed1††

Bar chart showing that comparable time in hypoglycemic range was observed between the AFREZZA and Usual Care groups at baseline and Week 17.

No significant change in pulmonary function1

FEV1 showed no significant difference between groups at 17 weeks

Bar chart showing that pulmonary function (FEV1) showed no significant difference between the AFREZZA and Usual Care groups at 17 weeks (range: 2.84 to 2.93).

Adverse events1‡‡

Table listing  adverse events occurring in each treatment group between randomization and 17 weeks post-randomization: severe hypoglycemia (n=1 in AFREZZA group), diabetic ketoacidosis (n=0), and other serious adverse events (n=2 in Usual Care group)

Treatment-emergent adverse events:

  • Cough is the most commonly reported AE in the AFREZZA group (14 of 62)
  • Only other TEAE >5% was shortness of breath (5 of 62)

Individualized Insulin Therapy

“Insulindividualized” logo signifying that HCPs can help their patients tailor their insulin choices and achieve ideal glycemic control.

Individualized insulin therapy for your patient: a possible scenario based on INHALE-3 study design and results1,3

Decision-tree schematic depicting a hypothetical scenario for individualized insulin therapy with AFREZZA based on INHALE-3 findings.

A1C=glycated hemoglobin; AID=automated insulin delivery; BG=blood glucose; CGM=continuous glucose monitor; FEV1=forced expiratory volume in one second; MDI=multiple daily injections; PLG=predictive low-glucose suspend technology; SC RAI=subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin; TIR=time in range; T1D=type 1 diabetes.

References: 1. Data on File (INHALE-3 Clinical Study Report 2024). MannKind Corporation. 2. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05904743. 3. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diabetes Care. 2024; 47 (Supplement_1): S158-S178.

© MannKind Corporation January, 2025. US-AFR-2566

Indications and Usage

Afrezza® (insulin human) Inhalation Powder is a rapid acting inhaled human insulin indicated to improve glycemic control in adult patients with diabetes mellitus.

Limitations of Use: Not recommended for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis, not recommended in patients who smoke or have recently stopped smoking.

Important Safety Information for Afrezza® (insulin human) Inhalation Powder

WARNING: RISK OF ACUTE BRONCHOSPASM IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE. Acute bronchospasm has been observed in patients with asthma and COPD using AFREZZA. AFREZZA is contraindicated in patients with chronic lung disease such as asthma or COPD. Before initiating AFREZZA, perform a detailed medical history, physical examination, and spirometry (FEV1) to identify potential lung disease in all patients.